When sexuality is the bottom line, even after all that evolution and revolution that we undergone throughout ages, homosexuality remains viewed by many as taboo-like.
As far as sexual awareness concern, there would usually employ the terms heterosexual, bisexual and homosexual.

Heterosexual is that person that feels attracted by the opposite sex. Bisexual is when the person, man or woman, enjoys taking the most out of both sexes and finally Homosexual is whoever feels attracted by same sex individuals.

Historically, homosexualism was common practice in the ancient Greece and Rome. Interestingly commenting that at the time there was no such a thing as bias. Certain emperors, philosophers, members of aristocracy and even of forces were adepts of such practice. The philosopher Socrates was homosexual and used to consider this type of relationship a mode of heightened inspiration among the thoughtful men, arguing that the heterosexual relationship would serve only for procreation purposes.

The relationship between homosexuals takes place in the very same way of heteros and bisexuals. It is a relation where kisses, caress and tenderness exist, there is foreplay and might as well penetrative sex come into play, however not obligatory. If anal sex with penetration comes to be the case as in male homosexuality, there is the active-role (whoever does penetrate), and the passive-one (he who gets penetrated). Such names seem currently going out of date to borderline-choice.

Such roles can suffer alternation, in other words, are not fixed although some same sex individuals reportedly their preferences regarding penetration. With regard to same sex females, otherwise known as lesbians, some may even resource on artifacts that substitute the penis. Many reported having preference towards oral sex and using fingers and hands for sex-linked pleasure.

Back to the razzmatazz, homosexuality as taboo occurs in detriment of various variables that actuate directly and indirectly upon human sexuality. I'm talking about values that go along with the individual throughout his life.

I mean even in these days and age there is still people who learn, along their upbringing, to look or regard this type of relation as an aberration or detraction of nature, a character trait, a disease- currently no longer considered as pathology, despite having so- appeared during years in the International Code of Diseases - CID. These people don't accept homosexuality and tend to overact with prejudice that might translate itself in form of fear- homophobia, repudiate, sometimes violence.

To the best of my knowledge such bias is the net result of social hypocrisies that prefers/seems to enjoy camouflaging certain aspects regarding human sexuality. In other words, any choice that someone makes with regards to his sex, consequently regarding his own sexuality belongs to oneself hence private. Therefore, it is not down to anybody to pass on judgment, lasting only respecting.

By Kelly Cristine Barbosa Cherulli